There’s a famous scene in the film Annie Hall, where Woody Allen is standing in line in a movie theater. Behind him, a pretentious professor is loudly proclaiming his opinions about the famous media thinker Marshall McLuhan. Allen’s character reaches the boiling point and from behind a film poster produces Marshall McLuhan himself, who proclaims to the pompous intellectual: “You know nothing of my work! How you got to teach a course in anything is totally amazing!” Woody tells the camera: “Boy, if life were only like this!”
We all wish that we had an impeccable source of information like that at our fingertips, especially when it comes to research on human health and well being. Imagine if you were in a debate – at work or with family and friends – about an issue pertaining to health. What if you could pull up a website and say: “I have the definitive scientific opinion right here!”
Actually, you can. It’s called the Cochrane Collaboration. I urge you to make the first of what I am sure will be many visits today. It is the true mother lode for objective scientific evidence on hundreds of issues relevant to mental and physical health and human development. You really can know what science has to say about many issues.
In the Cochrane Collaboration, teams of scientific experts from around the world synthesize the research information and issue reports offering guidance for what both professionals and the general public should do. It’s a non-profit, entirely independent organization, and that lets it provide up-to-date, unbiased information about the effects of health care practices and interventions.
The site is organized so you can, free of charge, get the abstract of any Cochrane review. What you will get is a clearly-written abstract of the review, written in layperson’s language. These can be used in to help answer your clients’ questions and in any situation where it helps to show the scientific consensus on an issue. They even have podcasts you can download of the reviews.
The number and scope of reviews is mind-boggling, and the Cochrane reviews take a very broad view of health (so you are sure to find ones relevant to your work). Here are just a few examples of the conclusions of reviews:
- Abstinence-only programs do not appear to reduce HIV risk among participants
- Flexible working interventions that increase worker control and choice (such as self-scheduling or gradual/partial retirement) are likely to have a positive effect on health outcomes.
- Vitamin C supplementation does not reduce the incidence of colds in the normal population
- The combination of educational and contraceptive interventions appears to reduce unintended pregnancy among adolescents.
The media are taking notice of the Cochrane Collaboration, in part because these objective reviews can help figure out what our health care system should be paying for — a nice report appeared in Sharon Begley’s Newsweek blog.
So hey – why are you still here and not looking at the reviews? The easiest place to start is on the review page, where you can search for topics or just browse through the reviews.
[…] systematic review published this month by the Cochrane Collaboration – one of our favorite data libraries – found that regular health checks-ups have no effect on a patient’s risk of developing […]